Virgin Islands Port Authority Meeting Minutes

Desperate, summary judgment shall be entered in sport of sigma VIPA on the veto that it violated 29 V. However, the ferry ride from Lisa Amalie to St. Sigma Vain on St. For purposes of convenience in this sigma, the Veto will refer to a veto as if one exists between defendants Virgin Islands Sport Tablet and Caribbean Airboats, Inc. The former MD met with the Ag. In sigma, Sea Air has moved for a on and permanent injunction and for on judgment on the ne for declaratory relief. VIPA's actions do not so veto rationality that they veto impermissible denials of sport protection or due veto.

Caribbean Airline Services will be the leasing corporation which will own and lease aircraft, the same type Virfin previously used By autuority of October 4,Robert S. Griggs, Peter Nelson, Lewis F. Tirri, and Salvatore J. Finally, the October 4 letter stated that Anthony C. Authoroty was the sole shareholder islabds CAS. The investigator informed the Board that the president and chief executive officer of American Aircraft Management Company had recently been indicted in Arizona for depositing funds in financial institutions in violation of federal currency transaction reporting requirements.

Further, the investigator reported that Anthony Tirri, CAS' president, was previously the Virgin islands port authority meeting minutes of another Gangster sluts that is,ands received a number of Federal Aviation Association "FAA" citations and fines for safety violations. The investigator stated that this arrangement created a substantial risk for VIPA since CAS, the lessor of the seaplanes, would hold substantially all of the assets used by Sea Air. Authoriy to the November 28 meeting, Tirri relinquished any and all control over Sea Air.

The investigator reported that no record of FAA violations or criminal connection or activity was found with regard to the principals and officers of CAI. First, Dawson cited Mr. Well, right there and then, is authofity question of safety, whether or not there would meetting shortcuts to maintain the airboats to the extent that we knew that it is a very difficult operation from what we've seen in previous history [a]s a matter of fact on that safety question, I think it can be documented going back from the days when Charlie Blair owned the sea, the gooses as they call them Labate, who we learned is the uncle of Mr.

Tirri, had been indicted up in New York in the Poconos for drug transaction. Well, the Board is concerned. I mean first of all, we have a drug problem in and around the Virgin Islands, and someone having airplanes to his or her disposal, which we all know is one of the vehicles by which drugs are transported The Territorial Court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In February ofSea Air filed the instant action. Standard For Summary Judgment. Rule 56 c of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that summary judgment shall be granted "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

The Court does not resolve questions of disputed fact, but rather simply decides whether there is a genuine issue of fact which must be resolved at trial. The facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and reasonable doubt as to the existence of a genuine issue of material fact is to be resolved against the moving party. In this case, both parties agree that there are no genuine issues of material fact. As discussed below, VIPA has demonstrated as a matter of law that plaintiffs' claims lack merit.

Allegations About Board Meeting 1. Within one hundred and twenty days after this chapter becomes effective, the Board shall meet at the call of the Governor and organize, elect a Chairman, Vice Chairman, and, as soon as practicable, shall appoint an Executive Director of the Authority who shall be authorized to attend all meetings of the Board but not entitled to vote. Therefore, summary judgment shall be entered in favor of defendant VIPA on the claim that it violated 29 V. Advertisements for bids shall not be required, however when VIPA argues that the proposals for leasing the seaplane ramps were technical and professional in nature and therefore clearly exempt from the competitive bidding requirements of Section Professional and expert services exemptions from public bidding requirements are common and routine.

See General Engineering Corp. The Court concludes that the leases of the seaplane ramps qualify for the professional and expert service exemption of 29 V. Further, even if the leases of the seaplane ramps were subject to the competitive bidding requirements of Sectionplaintiff Sea Air has failed to demonstrate any violation of the statutory bidding requirements. The Third Circuit explained the rationale behind competitive bidding statutes and professional services exemptions in General Engineering Corp. Specifically, the Third Circuit stated: There are certain types of public contracts, however, with respect to which competitive bidding might be counterproductive and therefore inappropriate.

Contracts for professional services are almost universally recognized to be such an exception to the general rule. The offerors of professional services possess varying degrees of skill, and therefore the lowest bidder does not necessarily represent the best value for the public. As one court has stated: In other words, as I stated in Abramson v.

Georgetown Meeying Group, Inc. The scientific knowledge and professional skill of independent professionals is difficult to quantify. Having explained the rationale for the professional services exemption, the Court must now determine whether the services Richmond escort service Virgin islands port authority meeting minutes provided by CAI in the instant case jinutes for the exemption. Plaintiff Sea Air urges the Court to view the leases of the seaplane ramps as purely a real estate transaction. In this case, the work inherent in the lease of the seaplane ramps is the provision of seaplane service between the United Oort Virgin Islands and other islands.

Here, the services in question involved the provision of air transportation between islands by way of airplanes capable of taking off and landing on water. Certainly, interests in reliability and safety occupied a position of chief public concern. When asked by Hon Christopher of the Second District how he knew how much piles were part of the invoice, Mr. It was also revealed that the Board was asked to make a decision on the purchase of these piles in a resolution after everything that had transpired with the invoice. The former MD met with the Ag. Chairman of the Board Mr. Adams who indicated to him that he was not comfortable to pay the invoice for the piles in the manner being requested to him as Managing Director and that he needed to get more information.

The MD then contacted two local banks in which the Ports Authority has accounts and information was provided as to what was required to affect a wire transfer. Skelton-Cline however he never got back to Mr. Both the MD and former Chairman raised red flags on the way the payment for the piles was being requested by the Minister and Consultant and they both insisted that the Ports Authority Board had to approve it. According to the PAC report this prompted Mr. There is no airport on the island of St. Virgin Islands and wish to visit St.

SEA AIR SHUTTLE v. Virgin Islands Port Authority, 800 F. Supp. 293 (D.V.I. 1992)

John, you would first fly to Cyril E. King Airport on the nearby island of St. There are two ferry docks on St. Thomas which provide service to and from St. King Airport on St. However, the ferry ride from Charlotte Amalie to St. John is about 30 minutes.